Opinion polling for the 2017 French presidential election

**Opinion polling for the 2017 French presidential election** refers to the systematic collection and analysis of public opinion data to gauge voter intentions and preferences in the lead-up to the two-round presidential election held in France in 2017. These polls provided insights into the evolving political landscape, candidate standings, and potential election outcomes from the announcement of candidacies through both rounds of voting.

# Opinion polling for the 2017 French presidential election

## Definition

Opinion polling for the 2017 French presidential election involved the regular measurement of voter intentions and attitudes toward candidates and political issues during the campaign period. Conducted by various polling organizations, these surveys aimed to predict electoral outcomes and understand voter behavior in the context of a highly competitive and transformative election.

## Background

The 2017 French presidential election was held in two rounds on April 23 and May 7, 2017. It was a pivotal election marked by the decline of traditional parties and the rise of new political movements. The main candidates included Emmanuel Macron of En Marche!, Marine Le Pen of the National Front, François Fillon of The Republicans, and Jean-Luc Mélenchon of La France Insoumise, among others.

Opinion polls played a crucial role in shaping public perception and campaign strategies. They tracked the fluctuating support for candidates amid scandals, debates, and shifting political alliances. The election was notable for the unexpected elimination of the Socialist Party candidate and the eventual victory of Emmanuel Macron.

## Polling methodology

### Polling organizations

Several reputable polling firms conducted surveys during the 2017 presidential election cycle, including:

– **Ifop-Fiducial**
– **Ipsos**
– **OpinionWay**
– **Harris Interactive**
– **BVA Group**
– **Elabe**

These organizations employed a variety of methodologies, including telephone interviews, online panels, and face-to-face surveys, to collect data from representative samples of the French electorate.

### Sampling and weighting

Polls typically used stratified sampling to ensure demographic representation across age, gender, region, and socio-economic status. Weighting adjustments were applied to correct for any sampling biases and to align the sample with known population parameters.

### Question design

Surveys asked respondents about their voting intentions in both the first and second rounds, often presenting hypothetical matchups for the runoff. Questions were carefully worded to minimize bias and to capture both decided voters and those still undecided.

### Frequency and timing

Polling frequency increased as the election approached, with multiple polls released weekly in the final months. Polls were conducted at various stages: pre-campaign, official campaign period, and immediately before each round of voting.

## First round polling

### Early polling trends

In the months leading up to the official campaign, polls showed a fragmented field with no clear frontrunner. François Fillon initially led among center-right voters, while Marine Le Pen maintained strong support on the far right. Emmanuel Macron, a political newcomer, gradually gained traction as his movement En Marche! gained visibility.

### Impact of scandals

The „Penelopegate” scandal, involving allegations of misuse of public funds by François Fillon, significantly affected polling numbers. Following the revelations in January 2017, Fillon’s support declined sharply, while Macron and Le Pen saw increases in their polling shares.

### Polling averages and projections

Aggregated polling data indicated a tightening race between Macron and Le Pen, with Fillon and Mélenchon competing for third place. Pollsters used moving averages to smooth out short-term fluctuations and provide clearer trend lines.

### Regional variations

Polls also highlighted regional differences in candidate support. Le Pen performed strongly in the northeast and rural areas, Macron found support in urban centers and among younger voters, while Fillon retained backing in conservative strongholds.

## Second round polling

### Hypothetical matchups

Given the two-round system, polls frequently tested various runoff scenarios, primarily between Macron and Le Pen, but also including Fillon and Mélenchon in earlier stages.

### Macron vs. Le Pen

From early 2017, polls consistently showed Macron leading Le Pen in the second round, often by margins ranging from 10 to 20 percentage points. This reflected Macron’s appeal to centrist and moderate voters, as well as the reluctance of many voters to support Le Pen’s far-right platform.

### Other second round scenarios

Before the first round, some polls considered Fillon vs. Le Pen and Mélenchon vs. Le Pen matchups. These scenarios generally showed Le Pen leading or narrowly trailing, but as Fillon’s support waned, these became less relevant.

## Polling accuracy and controversies

### Accuracy of final polls

The final opinion polls closely predicted the actual election results. Emmanuel Macron won the presidency with approximately 66% of the vote in the second round, consistent with polling forecasts. The first round results also aligned well with aggregated polling data.

### Polling errors and challenges

Despite overall accuracy, some polls underestimated the volatility of voter intentions and the impact of late-deciding voters. The rapid shifts following scandals and debates posed challenges for pollsters.

### Criticism and debate

Some commentators questioned the influence of polls on voter behavior, suggesting that frequent polling might have affected turnout or strategic voting. Additionally, the complexity of the French electoral system required careful interpretation of polling data.

## Impact of opinion polling on the election

### Campaign strategies

Candidates and their teams closely monitored polling data to adjust messaging, target demographics, and allocate resources. For example, Macron’s campaign capitalized on rising poll numbers to build momentum, while Fillon’s team struggled to counteract negative trends.

### Media coverage

Poll results were widely reported in the media, shaping public discourse and framing the narrative of the election. Polls contributed to the perception of Macron as the frontrunner and Le Pen as the main challenger.

### Voter behavior

Polling data may have influenced voter turnout and strategic voting, particularly in the first round where voters sought to ensure their preferred candidate advanced to the runoff.

## Summary of key polling trends

– Early polls showed a fragmented field with no clear leader.
– Fillon’s support collapsed after the „Penelopegate” scandal.
– Macron’s rise was steady and sustained, culminating in a strong lead.
– Le Pen maintained a solid base but was consistently behind Macron in second round matchups.
– Mélenchon attracted significant left-wing support but did not advance to the runoff.
– Polls accurately forecasted the final outcome, with Macron defeating Le Pen in the second round.

## Conclusion

Opinion polling for the 2017 French presidential election provided valuable insights into voter preferences and the evolving political landscape during a highly dynamic campaign. While challenges and uncertainties remained, polling data played a significant role in informing candidates, media, and the electorate. The election ultimately reflected the predictive power of well-conducted opinion surveys in a complex electoral context.

## See also

– 2017 French presidential election
– Emmanuel Macron
– Marine Le Pen
– François Fillon
– Jean-Luc Mélenchon
– French political polling

## References

*Note: This article is based on publicly available information and does not include direct citations.*

**META_DESCRIPTION:**
This article examines opinion polling conducted during the 2017 French presidential election, detailing methodologies, trends, and the impact of polls on the electoral process. It provides a comprehensive overview of voter intention surveys leading up to both rounds of voting.